SSDI — The Search for Allies

For the past year the genealogical community has been concerned about specific threats to our access to the Social Security Death Index (SSDI)  arising out of legislative responses to the filing of fraudulent tax refund claims involving the theft of identities of recently deceased infants and adults.  The Records Preservation and Access Committee has been active in identifying legislative proposals limiting access to this and other vital records and attempting to educate legislators about the implications of closing these records.

I have come away with one inescapable conclusion—We in the genealogical community have done an inadequate job of educating decision-makers about our contributions to society or the importance of access to the records we need.  At the moment, I see limited indications of anyone involved in the legislative process giving sympathetic consideration to our concerns or effectively advocating for them.

Advocates for closing records have been much more vocal and active.  Coalitions including such groups have been active in the arena in which some of our issues are being hammered out.  Conspicuously missing has been anyone representing genealogical interests at the table.

Recently, the Digital Due Process Coalition, a broadly-based coalition of commercial enterprises and NGOs has come to our attention, more fully described at http://www.digitaldueprocess.org .  Their current legislative focus has been on updating the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) originally adopted in 1986.  I understand that the active legislative vehicle of interest to this coalition was pending before the Senate Judiciary Committee in the form of an Substitute amendment to H.R. 2471 offered by the Committee Chair Senator Leahy with markup  scheduled for 29 November.  The  Leahy Amendment is found at: http://www.judiciary.senate.gov/legislation/upload/Leahy-Substitute-HR-2471.pdf .

At the October monthly  RPAC conference call, I was asked to explore the appropriateness of RPAC (or its component entities) participating in the activities of this coalition and injecting genealogical concerns into the dialogues hosted by them.  I considered this assignment to be part of an ongoing search for allies in our quest to preserve and promote access to the records we need.

My preliminary impression,  as reported to the RPAC leadership in mid-November, was that this coalition may provide a useful forum in the future for addressing our concerns about SSDI access, Model State Vital Statistics Act, records preservation initiatives, etc. The pending legislation updating ECPA has the potential of significantly impacting the operation of those entities in the genealogical community which maintain large data bases containing personally identifiable information, especially on living people.  Although genealogical societies may see only limited applicability of this legislation to their operations, it clearly does have the potential of impacting how major data aggregators such as FamilySearch and Ancestry do business.

More to come.

 

Share Button

2 thoughts on “SSDI — The Search for Allies

  1. I agree we can do a better job of making our case.

    So I guess the million dollar question is: what’s the best course of action? We need an action plan.

    I’ve been following this topic as closely as I can (time permitting) but, to date, I haven’t seen any kind of real action plan. And if a professional genealogist like myself who is following the issue hasn’t seen it, my guess is that Joe Public hasn’t either.

    Therefore, my two cents would be:

    1. Create an action plan

    2. Form a coalition. Link up with business owners/organizations/societies, etc. that can serve as distribution channels to help get the word out and garner support for said plan.

    3. Present the plan to (?) when enough support is obtained and we can speak as one, big coalition (vs. smaller groups).

    Forgive me if some of this has already been done and I missed it. I have seen actions here and there and I know people are doing what they can. But I think we’d have a lot more power if we could work together on a larger scale as a coalition. So far, I haven’t seen anything on a big scale.

  2. Well, I feel dumb now…I just noticed your “call to action kit” button. Sorry for not looking at the menu up top before posting. That’s what I get for trying to multi-task too much!

    I’ll help spread the word about the kit.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>